Dope. I've done plenty of Dope in my life, and had to come clean as well. Of course, this wasn't performance enhancing dope, and this wasn't during televised interviews, but was more likely in group meetings or smoke-filled rooms full of styrofoam coffee cups. And yes, a history of lying means others aren't going to believe what you say anyways. (How do you know an addict's lying? Their lips are moving. And, of course, beware of the crying addict. They are the most dangerous of them all.)
All of this to say I watched day one of the Lance Armstrong interview. I'm not going to pretend to know all the players, or be fully educated, or to have spent a ton of energy making an opinion, but here's a hodge-podge of thoughts;
Oprah was at times a prosecuting attorney, drilling with the facts and such, but on the human side let him off easy. I have seen how Oprah did James Frey from "A Million Little Pieces" and how she verbally castrated him (which she later apologized for). From the previews, it does seem that the more human and emotional side is coming out tomorrow.
Yes, Armstrong was trying to play the victim quite a bit and search for sympathy. Yes, he was coached by both his legal team and a PR firm. Yes, he still seems like a wilted, watered down version of an ass. It wasn’t a mea culpa, and he seemingly made the worst attempt at humor in the history of anybody anywhere who was ever tried to look for humor. ("But I didn't say she was fat...." What was that?) Cold, calculated pauses seemed to proceed each of his answers, and there was no sense of abject remorse or regret.
But I tried to keep asking myself what my daddy used to ask me to get me to think: "Would you want to be judged by the worst thing you ever did?"
All of this to say I watched day one of the Lance Armstrong interview. I'm not going to pretend to know all the players, or be fully educated, or to have spent a ton of energy making an opinion, but here's a hodge-podge of thoughts;
Oprah was at times a prosecuting attorney, drilling with the facts and such, but on the human side let him off easy. I have seen how Oprah did James Frey from "A Million Little Pieces" and how she verbally castrated him (which she later apologized for). From the previews, it does seem that the more human and emotional side is coming out tomorrow.
Yes, Armstrong was trying to play the victim quite a bit and search for sympathy. Yes, he was coached by both his legal team and a PR firm. Yes, he still seems like a wilted, watered down version of an ass. It wasn’t a mea culpa, and he seemingly made the worst attempt at humor in the history of anybody anywhere who was ever tried to look for humor. ("But I didn't say she was fat...." What was that?) Cold, calculated pauses seemed to proceed each of his answers, and there was no sense of abject remorse or regret.
But I tried to keep asking myself what my daddy used to ask me to get me to think: "Would you want to be judged by the worst thing you ever did?"
As for doping to enhance one's performance rather than to get high, the only way I can relate on any scale is marathon running and my ten year attempt at a Boston Qualifier. I was obsessed at times to qualify. It became the one thing that would make me feel worthy, the penultimate validation of my worth and power. I spent hours of training, even more hours of mental preparation revving my engines and studying training plans. I would do anything to accomplish this goal, but after falling short again and again, I was starting to think I was going to my grave with this goal unachieved.
But would I have cheated to get there? Would I be okay to run a BQ time if somehow they had shortened the course for me and nobody else could ever know?
Hell no, there would be no satisfaction whatsoever in that.
Hell no, there would be no satisfaction whatsoever in that.
Would I be okay to somehow electronically mess with my runners chip to take off 5 or 10 minutes off my time?
Hell no
Hell no
As a therapist, I've told many a client who has made horrible choices, that had I been where they were and experienced the sum of their experiences and then been at that same moment in time, I may have made that same horrible choice or even done much worse.
What bugs me most about the Armstrong situation, as is usually the case, is the cover up. His counter attack of destroying and suing and using the full powers of the 'LanceStrong' office to go against anyone who threatened his regime with the truth.
Armstrong's Tweet to his detractors, from many months ago. |
And then on Sunday, many of us will spend hours watching athletes doped up on the same drugs Lance has been using.
**Here's an interesting CNN interview with Betsy Andreu, who's quite unhappy with the interview.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2013/01/18/ac-armstrong-andreu-reacts-to-intv.cnn
An interesting video on his body language
http://news.yahoo.com/video/expert-armstrong-body-language-unsettling-212029796.html
8 comments:
Thanks for this. I was hoping you'd write about this as I was interested in your take. I couldn't watch the whole thing today myself. More time on the weekend to catch up.
Hey, too late I read it **smile** and it did add to the discussion, but all is good. I added more words to my own, mainly that Cold, calculated pauses seemed to proceed each of his answers, and there was no sense of abject remorse or regret.
Nice post Mark. I can see how he got caught up in the doping since it seems that everyone was doing it, but as I tell my teenagers, that's not a good reason to do it. I agree that the biggest problem is the finger waiving, I did nothing attitude he flaunted for years including alienating many close to him. #sad
I LOVE it! Although there are a few things that I may not totally agree with about what he's done, I still support him! I have been trying to explain why, and this write-up does it for me! Thanks! :)
Thanks for responding. I wasn't sure my post was in support of him, but I was trying to take a different angle and not just condemn and dismiss and throw stones. It seems like the biggest damages done was the ruthless attacks on those who challenged him for lies rather than the lying about doping itself. It seems like if you were an elite cyclist, you either doped, or you did not succeed since the playing field wasn't level, which is a shame.
Great post. You pose a very interesting question, one that isn't as easy to answer as we all think. After all, we all take various potions to help us feel better, recover faster, will plunge ourselves into freezing water that makes us scream obscenities because we believe it helps us...
I was thinking about James Frey, too. Because, at the time, I read that book, and really enjoyed it, and wasn't bothered in the least to find out it was fiction. I didn't watch the Oprah interview but I heard that she basically castrated him and I was annoyed because I didn't see it as that big a deal.
Lance, now that's different. Because he destroyed people.
Thanks for responding. Yes, and I wish Armstrong could understand and have empathy with how he effected others. As for James Frey, I knew 50 pages into the book that it was fiction, (you can't just beat up your therapist in the bathroom and move on like it was nothing), and couldn't finish reading it. There is a strange phenomenon among recovering addicts where they try to outdo each other with addiction war stories. He is a great writer, and in a way, if he had never 'doped' he probably wouldn't have been as talented.
Post a Comment